South Africa
Elephant culling could deter international tourists─── ZENANDE MPAME 15:22 Fri, 28 Aug 2026
South Africa’s ongoing debate over elephant management could have consequences well beyond the country’s game reserves.
New international tourism research points to a potential shift in visitor behaviour if culling is reinstated. As authorities consider how to manage growing elephant populations, the findings are likely to add pressure for solutions that balance conservation needs with the economic importance of wildlife tourism.
A survey commissioned by Humane World for Animals South Africa found 60% of international respondents would consider choosing a different destination if mass or selective elephant culling were reintroduced. Almost half said they would be less likely to visit South Africa because of elephant culling.
The findings come amid renewed concerns over the potential culling of more than 2,000 elephants in parts of the country, including North West’s Madikwe and several KwaZulu-Natal game reserves.
“The concern is that instead of culling being a last-resort option, this would be considered a primary option,” said biologist and long-standing elephant conservation specialist Dr Audrey Delsink.
“Elephants are extremely social, and they are very close-knit, and they have very close social bonds. The consequences of management decisions can continue for decades, particularly where young elephants are left without adult supervision following the killing of family groups.”
“South Africa has developed more humane approaches to elephant management that can address population numbers without lethal intervention. Culling should only be considered as a last resort, with complete transparency, public consultation and independent scientific review.”
Elephant management should take into account the broader ecosystem rather than focusing solely on elephant numbers, she said. South Africa’s fenced reserves, artificial water points, feeding practices, fire management and other environmental factors can influence how elephants affect landscapes.
The survey found support for non-lethal alternatives, with 80% of international respondents agreeing such methods should be prioritised wherever possible. Options include expanding elephant ranges, creating wildlife corridors, managing water sources, translocation and immunocontraception.
Humane World for Animals has supported an elephant immunocontraception programme in partnership with the University of Pretoria’s Veterinary Population Management Laboratory. The initiative has vaccinated more than 1,800 wild female elephants across approximately 50 reserves outside Kruger National Park.
“The availability of these methods means South Africa should ensure they are properly implemented before lethal measures are considered,” said Delsink.
• Have a news tip to share? Phone or whatsapp the OFM News Hotline on 066 487 1427.

